سرطان بزرگسالان

Effects of Probiotics with or without Honey on Radiation-induced Diarrhea

ABSTRACT

Background: Diarrhea is a well-recognized side effect associated with pelvic radia on; however, there is not any effec ve common treatment for radia on-induced diarrhea. A popular alterna ve is probio cs, which have

been used in several gastrointes nal disorders. Probio cs are live microbial food supplements. Furthermore, honey is a puta ve nutri onal with a variety of health effects, including an bacterial, an oxidant, an -inflammatory and prebio c. The present study evaluated the effects of probio c with or without

honey on radia on-induced diarrhea. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven

adult pa ents with pelvic cancer underwent radiotherapy for four weeks.

They randomized to receive probio c (n = 22), probio c plus honey (n = 21) or placebo (n = 24) from one week before radiotherapy for five weeks. Diarrhea grade and stool consistency score were recorded weekly according to the Common Toxicity Criteria system and the Bristol scales, respec vely. Results: The results showed a decrease in the daily number of bowel movements (p = 0.003 and 0.006), diarrhea grade (p = 0.001 and 0.001) and the need for an diarrheal medica on (p = 0.021 and 0.041) also an increase in the stool consistency (p = 0.004 and 0.005) in pa ents who either used probio c or probio c plus honey (respec vely), these were significant in weeks 4 and 5 of treatment. Conclusion: Probio cs with or without honey can reduce the

incidence of radia on-induced diarrhea and the need for an diarrheal medica on.

Keywords: Probiotics, honey, diarrhea, radiotherapy, pelvic cancer.

INTRODUCTION

PelvicradiothAllas Dairy Company, Isfahan, Iran.

Simple randomization was used to allocate patients to three groups: group one received probiotics (two probiotic capsules per day, one capsule in the morning after breakfast and another one in the evening, after consuming 150 grams of low-fat yogurt); group two took a combination of probiotic and honey (two probiotic capsules and 30 grams honey per day, one capsule and 15 grams honey in the morning after breakfast and another one capsule in the evening, after consuming 150 grams of low-fat yogurt and 15 grams honey at night); group three was the control group received two placebo capsules per day, one capsule in the morning after breakfast and another one in the evening, after consuming 150 grams of low-fat yogurt). After randomization, the patients underwent our treatment one week before starting pelvic radiotherapy and then they continued to take the same their regime during the treatment course (in total 5 weeks).

Equal dietary recommendations, including a list of prohibited and allowed foods, were given to all the participants. All patients received the same kind and rate of low-fat yogurt and consumption of other dairy products except yogurt were not allowed. Taking antidiarrheal medication (except prescribed by the physician) and antimicrobial drug were also prohibited; however, if patients needed to take antidiarrheal medication its consumption was recorded as an ef(icacy criterion.

Severity of the diarrhea was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute (49): grade 1 = increase of 2-3 stools per day compared to pre-treatment, grade 2 = increase of 4-6 stools per day or nocturnal stools, grade 3 = increase of 7-9 stools per day or incontinence, grade 4 = increase of 10 or more stools, IV hydration needed. To evaluate the consistency of stool, adapted Bristol scale (50) was used to facilitate its use by patients: normal stools (Bristol 1-4), soft stools, in pieces (Bristol 5-6) and liquid stools, no shape (Bristol 7). The patients evaluated for the daily number of bowel movement (defecation), diarrhea grade, stool consistency score, the need for antidiarrheal medication and bloating weekly by one person.

Data were analyzed using: Chi-square, Fisher’s exact and one-way ANOVA test. Post analysis was done by LSD (Least Signi(icant Difference) method in order to do paired comparison (treatment group VS. placebo group). The pvalue less than 0.05 was considered as statistically signi(icant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (v. 16, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Among 78 patients involved in this study, 11 patients were excluded for failure to follow up. Patients were aged between 20 to 85 years (mean age = 62 ± 14.8 years). Patient characteristics are detailed in table 1.

Daily number of bowel movements

The minimum and maximum daily number of bowel movements was 0 and 7 for the probiotic group, and 0 and 10 for the probiotic plus honey and placebo groups respectively. The daily number of bowel movements was higher in week 4 for the probiotic (2.8) and placebo (4.9) groups and weeks 2 and 5 for the probiotic plus honey group (2.5). The results of the linear mixed model test showed that the mean daily number of bowel movements in the placebo group was signi(icantly higher than the probiotic and probiotic plus honey groups throughout the treatment course (p= 0.003 and p= 0.006 respectively) ((igure 1).

Diarrhea grade

Moderate to severe diarrheal symptoms (grades 2, 3) was recorded in 31 (46.3%) patients during pelvic radiotherapy. The number (percentage) patients with diarrhea grades 2 and 3 was 7 (31.8), 4 (19) and 17 (70.8) during the treatment for the probiotic, probiotic plus honey and placebo groups respectively. The results of Mann-Whitney test showed that the mean diarrhea grade in weeks 4 and 5 was signi(icantly higher in the placebo group than the probiotic and probiotic plus honey groups (p= 0.007 and 0.001 for probiotic and p˂ 0.001 and p= 0.001 for probiotic plus honey in weeks 4 and 5 respectively) as shown in (igure 2. Fisher's exact test also revealed that patients in the placebo group were diagnosed with grade 2 diarrhea, signi(icantly, earlier than the probiotic (P=0.016) and probiotic plus honey groups (P=0.005).

erapy, either alone or with chemotherapy, has established to be successful in the treatment of many of pelvic cancers. Pelvic radiation causes acute intestinal symptoms in over 80% of patients include diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting and reduces quality of life in about 50% of patients (1-3). The main adverse event of pelvic radiation is diarrhea (4-7). Cancer patients suffering from diarrhea complain of feeling fear, shame, and distress (5, 8).

There is a large intestinal mucosal in the pelvic radiation (ield. Symptoms usually begin during the second week of treatment (3, 6, 9, 10) and can cause other problems such as malnutrition, abdominal pain, fecal incontinence, proctorrhagia, dehydration, weakness, stress (3, 11-14) and the function of the immune system is reduced (15).

There are no prophylactic agents con(irmed for the prevention of pelvic radiation enteritis (14, 16). Some of nutritional regimes have been tried, but evidences are weak and limited (17, 18). Radiation induced diarrhea is treated with medication such as Loperamide (19, 20). Treatment failure occurs in many patients (20, 21). The new methods that aim at other mechanisms in the pathophysiology of radiation-induced diarrhea

are required. Recently, probiotics are well known to have bene(icial effects on intestinal problems (22-25). Studies in animal models and clinical trials of patients with in(lammatory bowel disease (IBD) have frequently shown that use of probiotic organisms can effectively modulate the severity of intestinal in(lammation through altering the composition and the metabolic and functional properties of gut (lora (26, 27). Some clinical studies have investigated the use of probiotics for the prevention and treatment of radiation induced diarrhea (19, 21, 2832). Probiotic literally means “for life”. Probiotics are live microorganisms when ingested in suf(icient numbers, they are expected to confer one or more proven health bene(its on the consumer. Probiotics are supplements including viable nonpathogenic microorganisms such as Lactobacillus and Bi,idobacterium to modulate the host’s micro(lora by colonization and maintenance of the balance between proin(lammatory and anti-in(lammatory cytokines (10, 33-35). Probiotics function has actually remained unclear, although several hypotheses are being proposed. Probiotics may facilitate the production of antibacterial substances (cytokines and butyric acid), reduce the pathogenic species by creating competitive inhibition, decrease epithelial permeability to intraluminal pathogens, stimulate immune cells and create a barrier to pathogens by lowering intestinal pH. They also stimulate lactase production, which helps lactose digestion, and enhance intestinal micro (lora (22-24, 36-38).

Abdominal bloating may occur in some probiotic users and occurrence of bloating may treatment of radiation-induced diarrhea in cancer patients and probiotic plus honey has not been used for this purpose yet. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the ef(icacy of the probiotic with or without honey in comparison with placebo, to prevent or delay the incidence of radiation-induced diarrhea. Secondary objectives were to assess if intake of probiotic with or without honey decreases the need of antidiarrheal medication as well as increases in stool consistency. Overall the main aim of research was to (ind more effective and with less side effect regimen for control of radiation-induced diarrhea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

be resulted from gas production in the Clinical Trials (IRCT2015030421338N1).

A randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study was performed on 67 patients diagnosed with pelvic cancers (colorectal, prostate, endometr, bladder, ovary, cervix, bone sarcoma) that were referred to Radiation Oncology Clinic at Sayyed-AlShohada Hospital, Isfahan, Iran from October 2012 to May 2013. The treatment protocol was explained to patients and they were given informed consent to participate. Exclusion criteria included opioid usage, antimicrobial treatment and the presence of any acute or chronic gastrointestinal condition associated with diarrhea for at least one month before recruitment. Study protocol, the informed consent and materials were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of

gastrointestinal

‘Prebiotics’ are food ingredients that stimulate the growth and/or activity of probiotics (40). Honey properties are antiin(lammatory, antioxidant, antitumor (41-43) and effective ‘prebiotic’ (44-46). On the other hand, according to an old belief, patients with diarrhea to improve their problem eat yogurt (47). Also yogurt is known as a popular food carrier of probiotics (48).

There are few experiences in effect of probiotic organisms for the prevention and All the patients were irradiated with conventional radiotherapy to a total dose from 4000 to 5000 cGy (1.8 Gy/day) with 18 MV. The upper edge of the AP (ield varied from the third lumbar vertebra to the (irst sacral bone and extended to the lower edge of the pubic bones and laterally, covering a 1.5 - 2 cm of the pelvic inlet rim, varied according to the abdominopelvic disease. Patients received conventional radiotherapy (ive fractions weekly for 4 -5 weeks.

Probiotic capsules ‘LactoCareOD ’ (Zist Takhmir Company, Tehran, Iran) contained: Lactobacillus casei 1.5 × 109 CFU, Lactobacillus acidophilus 1.5 × 1010 CFU, Lactobacillus rhamnosus 3.5 × 109 CFU, Lactobacillus bulgaricus 2.5 × 108 CFU,

Bifidobacterium breve 1 × 1010 CFU, Bifidobacterium longum 5 × 108 CFU and

Streptococcus thermophilus 1.5 × 108 CFU per 500 mg. Coriander honey was obtained from Zagros Mountains (Khansar) in Iran (Keshtzare Sabz Company, Khansar, Iran). Fresh honey bee used in this study was assessed and approved by the Food and Drug Administration Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, according to Iranian National Standard No.92. Placebo capsules containing 500 mg of corn starch, with the same size, shape and color of probiotic capsules were purchased from Zist Takhmir Company, Tehran, Iran. Yogurt In packages of 150 g was purchased from

Stool consistency

The mean stool consistency was initially 3.8 for all groups. During the treatment, mean consistency stool was 4.3 for the probiotic and probiotic plus honey groups and 5.7 for the placebo group. The results of Mann-Whitney test showed that the mean stool consistency score in the probiotic and the probiotic plus honey groups were signi(icantly lower than the placebo group in weeks 4 and 5 of treatment (p= 0.003 and 0.004 for the probiotic group and p˂ 0.001 and p= 0.005 for the probiotic plus honey group in weeks 4 and 5 respectively) ((igure 3).

The need for antidiarrheal medication During pelvic radiotherapy was found that antidiarrheal medication is required for 13 (19.4%) patients. Among all patients, 9.1%, 9.5% and 37.5% belonged to the probiotic, probiotic plus honey and placebo groups respectively needed for antidiarrheal medication. In the (irst week no patients needed for antidiarrheal medication. Only one and two patients in the (ifth week needed for antidiarrheal medication in the probiotic and probiotic plus honey respectively. The number of patients who needed for antidiarrheal medication in the placebo group was one, four, three, one in weeks 2, 3, 4, 5 respectively. The Fisher's exact test showed that the number of patients who needed to antidiarrheal medication

in the placebo group was signi(icantly higher than the probiotic (P=0.038) and probiotic plus honey groups (P=0.04) ((igure 4). The result of Fisher's exact test also indicated that patients in the groups that received probiotic used antidiarrheal medication later than the placebo group (P=0.021 and P=0.041 for the probiotic and probiotic plus honey respectively).

Adverse effects

Some of probiotics users reported stomach pain and bloating. During pelvic radiotherapy, three patients (they belonged to probiotic user; with or without honey) complained of upper abdominal pain. The causal link between the complaint and the probiotic was not investigated. During the treatment 45 patients complained of bloating (19 patients of the probiotic group, 16 patients of the probiotic plus honey group and 10 patients in the placebo group). The results of the Chi-square test showed that the number of patients with bloating in the probiotic groups (alone or plus honey) was signi(icantly higher than the placebo group (P=0.002 and 0.021 for the probiotic and the probiotic plus honey groups, respectively) ((igure 5).

DISCUSSION

Diarrhea is most (80%) and worst side effect of pelvic radiotherapy (1-3). Different studies have focused on the prevention or control of radiation -induced diarrhea. In the current study probiotic with or without honey were used in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy.

Some studies show signi(icant bene(icial effects of probiotics on control of radiationinduced diarrhea; Delia et al. (19, 51) and Timko (31). The bene(its of probiotic therapy with VSL#3 (probiotics, including: L. casei, L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, L.delbruekii subsp. Bulgaricus, B. longum, B. breve, and B. infantis, Streptococcus salivarius subsp. Thermophiles) have been recorded in 490 patients during radiotherapy after surgery for the abdominal and pelvic cancer in a double-blind, placebo- controlled trial. The mean daily number of bowel movements in these 490 patients was 4.6 ± 2 and 12.3 ± 4 in VSL#3 and placebo recipients, respectively (19). Similarly, a randomized study has demonstrated a decrease in the mean number of bowel movements (p<0.05) and a decrease in the incidence

of diarrhea (p<0.01) in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy and taking Lactobacillus acidophilus (29). Another randomized placebo controlled nutrition trial reported that yogurt containing Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 signi(icantly improved the consistency of stool, without reducing the incidence of radiation-induced diarrhea (21).

The mean of bowel movement frequency in our study was 2.09 and 2.18 per day in the probiotic and probiotic plus honey groups respectively and 3.32 in the placebo group, which is obviously lower to the 5.1 and 14.7 per day in the VSL#3 and placebo groups respectively reported by Delia et al. (19, 51), but results of Timko et al. study (4.16 in the probiotic group and 2.52 in the Hylak Tropfen Forte group) (31) were closer to our study. Some investigators considered stool consistency, rather than frequency of bowel movement, to be a more appropriate measure of diarrhea (52). In this study, the stool consistency was normal (score 4.3 in Bristol scale) for the probiotic and probiotic plus honey groups and soft (score `5.7 in Bristol scale) for the placebo group, which is obviously lower than stool consistency score in the probiotic (taking liquid yogurt containing L. casei DN-114 001 at 108 CFU/g) and placebo groups in Giralt et al. study (21). In Giralt et al. study over 80% of patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy reached the worse stool consistency score (6 and 7 in Bristol scale), without signi(icant difference between the two (probiotic and placebo) groups(21). Since some studies show that yogurt is effective in the treatment of diarrhea (47) and it is as probiotic carrier food (48), low-fat yogurt taking in our study may be a reason for the difference of the number of bowel movements and stool consistency score between this study and similar studies (19, 53) in the patients who underwent pelvic radiotherapy. More controlled clinical trials are needed to con(irm this issue.

In the present study patients who need for antidiarrheal medication in the probiotic and probiotic plus honey groups were signi(icantly less than the placebo group, also in Timko et al. study 27% in the probiotic group and 55% in the Hylak Tropfen Forte group needed for antidiarrheal medication (31). The (irst prescription of antidiarrheal medication in the Delia et al. study (19) was in the VSL#3 group signi(icantly later than in the control group, which this result was similar to our study. Although we expected probiotic plus honey is more effective than probiotic alone, but statistically signi(icant difference was not found. This (inding may have resulted from effect of honey as prebiotic needed prolonged time to improve probiotics. No similar study has been found.

Important differences between our study and other studies are the treatment protocols, onset of intake as well as dosages, species and strains of probiotics. The most commonly used strains of probiotics in reported researchs are lactobacillus, Bi,idobacterium and cocci (22, 23, 25, 36). Since bloating may be a side effect of probiotics use (39), in this study bloating was asked the patients. These results showed that patients taking probiotics suffered from bloating more than the control group during the treatment. However, the severity of the symptom was not enough to discontinue the use of probiotics. In the similar studies that have investigated effects of probiotics on diarrhea, bloating has not evaluated.

Our result showed that probiotics improved the quality of life of patients undergoing pelvic radiation. So probiotic usage can prevent premature discontinuation of pelvic radiation and increase radiation dose if need be. The veri(ication of bene(icial use of probiotics in patients undergoing radiation needs more clinical trial. Since probiotics (with or without honey) did not completely prevent moderate to severe diarrhea during treatment, this study suggest that probiotics are used as a bene(icial supplement to reduce pelvic radiation-induced diarrhea.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thanks to Zist Takhmir Company of,icials for providing probiotics and placebo, Mr. Hadi; Allas Company management for providing the yogurt, Keshtzare Sabz Company management for providing honey, Radiation Oncology Clinic of Sayyed-Al-Shohada Hospital staff also and the Lab Manager of Food and drug Administration Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. This research was supported by a grant from the University of Isfahan and Cancer Prevention Research Center at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Project No: 291196).

Con"lict of interest: Declared None